[tomoyo-dev-en 315] Re: "file execute" directive with optional"destination domain" argument.

アーカイブの一覧に戻る

Toshiharu Harada harad****@gmail*****
Sat Aug 27 08:56:49 JST 2011


Jamie's summary helped me. Thanks a lot >Jamie

I have no firm objections as Jamie, either. But I've been wondering
if TOMOYO really needs new directives while "aggregator" is available.

I assume the new suggestions include several
different purposes/advantages. What seems to be most
important to you? >Tetsuo (Eliminating needs to synchronize the
exception policy? I guess)

2011/8/27 Jamie Nguyen <jamie �� tomoyolinux.co.uk>:
> Tetsuo Handa wrote:
>> Jamie Nguyen wrote:
>>> Is my understanding correct?
>>
>> Yes.
>
> Great. While I have no firm objections, here are some of my initial thoughts.
>
> In the example I gave, 5 lines are saved from exception policy. This
> is good, but personally, I find exception policy to be very powerful
> and I use it whenever possible. Supposing you have "keep_domain
> /bin/cat from any" in exception policy. If you change your mind and
> then want /bin/cat to cause a domain transition in many domains, it is
> a matter of deleting a single line. Supposing instead that you have
> "file execute /bin/cat keep" in many domains, changing your mind in
> this case requires many lines to be changed. A simple sed could be
> used of course, but the point I'm making is the convenience of
> exception policy.
>
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but two of the main reasons for the creation
> exception policy are for the centralization of policy and for the
> convenience of making changes to many domains. For example, instead of
> having "/dev/sr0" in many domains, you can have "@DVD_DRIVE" instead
> and only have to change one entry in exception policy if the device
> ever changes. Without centralizing into exception policy, many lines
> are required to be changed. Again, a simple sed could be used, but I
> personally feel that (in the interests of code simplicity) the
> addition of more directives/arguments/options into domain policy is
> not necessary when exception policy is coping just fine.
>
> Having said that, I'm ready to be convinced otherwise ;-)

>From another "ready to be convinced". :-)




More information about the tomoyo-dev-en mailing list
アーカイブの一覧に戻る