Fujii Masao
masao****@gmail*****
2016年 7月 10日 (日) 01:58:31 JST
On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 12:15 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawad****@gmail*****> wrote: > > > On Saturday, 9 July 2016, Fujii Masao <masao****@gmail*****> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 10:22 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawad****@gmail*****> >> wrote: >> > On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Fujii Masao <masao****@gmail*****> >> > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> Attached patch marks each pg_bigm functions safe or not for parallel >> >> queries >> >> that PostgreSQL 9.6 supports. This patch must be applied if we want to >> >> execute full text search queries using pg_bigm in parallel mode. >> >> >> >> Does anyone review the patch? >> >> >> > >> > Thank you for the patch! >> > >> > + >> > +/* Label whether the function is deemed safe for parallelism */ >> > +DO $$ >> > +DECLARE >> > + gversion TEXT; >> > +BEGIN >> > >> > s/gversion/pgversion/g >> > >> > "p" is missing. >> >> Thanks for the review! >> >> But ISTM that "p" is NOT missing in the patch... >> So, could you check the patch again? >> > > Oops, something was wrong. > Sorry. No problem. Thanks for the review! I pushed the patch. Regards, -- Fujii Masao
Fork