> From: Keith Marshall <keith****@users*****> > Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 14:17:36 +0000 > > > There's nothing special about MinGW dlopen, ... > > Actually, there is ... > > > ... AFAICT: it is just a fancy way of calling LoadLibrary. > > While you may consider it as such, this trite dismissal may serve to > denigrate the additional features it offers; e.g.:-- No denigration intended, to be sure. I was describing what dlopen will do in the OP's use case, that doesn't seem to need the additional (and important) features.